Peer Review
ACSJ uses double-anonymous peer review to ensure the highest standards of scientific quality.
Double-Anonymous Peer Review
Author → Reviewer
Author identity hidden from reviewers. Manuscripts anonymised before distribution.
Reviewer → Author
Reviewer identity hidden from authors. Minimum 2 independent external reviews per article.
What We Expect
Expertise
Review only within your subject expertise. Decline if you lack the necessary knowledge.
Timeliness
Complete reviews within 21 days. Extensions available if needed.
Constructive Feedback
Provide actionable, respectful feedback focused on scientific quality.
Objectivity
Review solely on scientific merit. Disclose conflicts of interest.
Confidentiality
Manuscripts are confidential. Do not share or use AI systems for review.
Standards
Evaluate originality, significance, methodology, data quality, and presentation.
Reviewer Ethics
Do not use AI systems to review manuscripts due to confidentiality risks.
Do not use review information for personal advantage.
Disclose conflicts of interest and recuse when necessary.
Report suspected misconduct to the Editor-in-Chief.
Do not contact authors directly.
Become a Reviewer
Join our expert reviewer network and contribute to the quality of aerospace composite research.